Now piloting Aiki Wiki “Parley”, a conversational tool for the web for negotiation, conflict resolution, consensus or any type of critical conversation. When the conversation reaches a threshold, two individuals can rewrite the consensus topic together.
Parley Aiki Wiki is an algorithm for natural human conversation on the web that does not rely on a voting algorithm nor a ranking algorithm, but rather a type of conversational game theory that allows for thorough decision making while simultaneously filtering toxicity or misinformation from online conversation without requiring any censorship.
While the pilot is only open within our community at first for testing, you can reach out to me on twitter if you want to participate in the pilot.
This is how it works.
This unique gamification processes conversation through nine potential “arcs” of game play, or conversation which lead the pair through resolution or further away from consensus editing, depending on their decisions.
Our pilot is only demonstrating a single paired conversation between two anonymous individuals who may disagree on a particular topic or decision.
The first chapter of game play is simply the discovery of an idea topic that is “served” to the individual, where they can choose to Parley the idea.
Once Parley is initiated, the user can return the serve, first by tagging the idea 0, 1 or 2 and adjusting the tag if necessary…here #objective
Once tagged, the user completes “The Return” on “The Serve” by leaving their own idea or reply to the topic, and then tagging their own reply with 0, 1, or 2.
This is really all there is to Parley Aiki Wiki, tagging other’s ideas, comments or replies, replying with our own ideas or comments, and then also tagging our own reply with 0, 1 or 2.
Next, the person replying is “matched” with another participant in “Love”, the third component of Parley Aiki Wiki, the part of the game where two anonymous participants are “paired” for the conversation, meet up to collaborate, or combat.
For our pilot, we are using “Tennis” as a metaphor for Parley Aiki Wiki’s unique discussion threading, but unlike Tennis as purely a competitive sport with one winner and one loser, Parley Aiki Wiki transforms the natural conflict of idea into a “win-win” outcome, where the competition itself allows both anonymous participants to win in the outcome.
Once participants are paired, natural conversation can go in any potential direction. This part of game play is called “Rally”, tagging and replying to each other’s responses.
Depending on the participants decisions, the conversation can go in any direction and no matter which direction the conversation goes in, the computational system can mirror and match it.
The system can determine if the conversation reaches a threshold which can allow users permission to begin rewriting the consensus idea…together.
The tool applies something like game theory to the obtaining of permissions to change the consensus idea, a game of combat and collaboration, where resolution is the only possible outcome. This means that within the game play, the conversation can take turns for the worst, such as manipulation, deception, the promulgation of misleading information, and filter it away from consensus building and even ranking.
We call these events Fault and Spin–movements of conversation where problematic thinking or participation is encountered.
Once the threshold is reached, participants co-write what is reliable, personal and what is the open question around the topic, winning these permissions through the game play, which publishes the outcome in a transparent way.
This is how the Consensus idea started, a single coherent idea…but the idea can change…
This is the result, one single coherent idea was transformed into an article with “contextual completeness”, or the “total view”, what is known, personal, and what is unknown in the topic, published as an article through conversation, computationally.
Convergence or Abandonment
At each moment of game play, decision making incentivizes convergence, or a mutual agreeable outcome in some way, while abandonment, deception or trolling has neutral effect on the outcome of the consensus process. This means the system can account for all possible outcomes within a challenged conversation between conflict and resolution.
Introducing the Win Win Protocol for the World Wide Web
Our computational system comes with an API which can be exported to social media platforms, consensus platforms, web3 governance or blockchain transactions, and most intriguing, AI agents. Aiki Wiki offers a profound solution to the issue of ethics in AI and LLM systems, perfect alignment and perfectly reliable systems where human agents make all of the decisions but the AI is solely focused on win win collaboration and reliable distribution of information on the web.
Please support the Win Win Protocol for the World Wide Web
We are currently raising funds to further develop Aiki Wiki, set up the companies and global library, as well as resubmit for the National Science Foundation’s SBIR program, which invited us to submit the project.
If you would like to send crypto support for the project, we accept Ethereum and Matic here: 0xaaA8503B7281e50Cc2bFa08ff328d6A54057101e
If you would like to invest in Aiki Wiki through BAE or private investment, reach out to rome at bigmotherdao DOTCOM.